Describing commissioned military officers as "military judges," is like calling Punxsutawney Phil a weather man.
Guy Montag, a major character in Ray Bradbury's famous Fahrenheit 451, is described a "Fireman." But in Bradbury's world the conditions of Montag's employment require the "Fireman" to set books afire and murder citizens. Bradbury's "Firemen" do not to protect lives or property.
They take them.
Military panels are not juries, nor do they operate in any way as a federal jury. Courts-martial are not federal courts. Commissioned military officers described as military judges are not federal judges. Military due process is not civilian "due process." There can be no appeals in a world absent courts, juries, and judges. In the military there are instead reviews of command decisions.
And so it goes.
Here endth the lesson.
The JAG Hunter. Copyright©2007
Labels: Article 32, due process, federal judges, JAG, JAG Hunter, judges, military discipline, military due process, military judges, UCMJ, Uniform Code of Military Justice
Copyright © 2009 The JAG HUNTER
Get subscribers posted by The JAG Hunter @ 1/29/2007 08:26:00 AM 0 comments
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home