U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MISC. ORDER NO. 2009-0346 OF THURSDAY, JULY 2, 2009
"The individuals who have made this presentment were not convned by [the U.S. COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA] to sit as a grand jury nor have they been selected at random from a fair cross section of this district.
Any self-styled indictment or presentment issued by such a group has no force under the Constitution or laws of the United States.
As such, leave to file this present is hereby DENIED.
Signed by Judge Royce Lamberth
Thursday, 2 July 2009
Labels: America's Grand Jury, Judge Royce Lamberth, U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Copyright © 2009 The JAG HUNTER
9 Comments:
Let's just face it.
Nobody cares about what Obama is doing.
We are all doomed.
Here is a refresher for the judge who really doesn't know what is in the contitution for grand jury - this was found on rise up for america:
The 5th Amendment of our U.S. Constitution provides that: … ‘No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury.’ It doesn’t say ‘Federal’ Grand Jury, a ‘Grand Jury called and impaneled by a Judge, Special Prosecutor, or District Attorney’, nor does it say a ‘Government impaneled’ Grand Jury.
They deny people who care about the constitution, but leave an unconstitutional Kenyan-born usurper in office. That is very unconstitutional. He needs a refresher course on natural born citizen clause as well, which is in the constitution.
So let me get this straight: In a land with a government for, of and by the people the people have no standing court in regard to a candidate's/president's eligibility?
I would make a lousy judge because I would be unable to make something so simple so complicated.
It's interesting to note, that the Judge affirms that the Presentments are in fact Constitutionally permitted.
So, because of a "rule" in 1946, only the Government can convene a Grand Jury....however....the presentments given by the Citizens Grand Jury are in fact Constitutionally permitted?
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/01/26/scotus-on-the-unique-power-of-grand-jurors/
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/01/22/the-federal-grand-jury-is-the-4th-branch-of-government/
IMO, anyone in a position of power to do anything (i.e. subpoena his records, hold a hearing, order a trial, etc) on this eligibility issue...is hiding under the blanket of fear.
At each turn people (this judge) put themselves on one side or another of this issue.
Where is basic curiosity and commitment to logic that should be present in all judiciary?
This judge, A Reagan appointee, quibbles with semantics, while ignoring the blatantly illegal destruction of our way of life?
The system leaves us with little choice.
The Tree is wilting... a little selective watering in time may prevent a wholesale diluvian event later.
"Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy."
Sir Winston Churchill
Well, looks like the totalitarians are making certain the redress of grievances shall be denied.
Please refer to JFK's famous quote.
The powers want chaos. They will feed very well... for a time.
"The individuals who have made this presentment were not convned by [the U.S. COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA] to sit as a grand jury nor have they been selected at random from a fair cross section of this district."
OK - the judge explained his objection. How do we convene a grand jury selected at random from a fair cross-section of any district?
Somewhere is there a judge or other court official that can organize such a thing, get it properly started, and let it work its way up to the "discovery" point?
Post a Comment
<< Home