JUDGE ROYCE LAMBERTH GRANTS PREMISSION TO PROSECUTE SOETORO-OBAMA ON CRIMINAL CHARGES OF FRAUD AND TREASON! JUST NOT IN LAMBERTH'S COURT~
CLICK ON ROBERT HEFNER'S ILLUSTRATION TO ENLARGE
BRAVO ZULU TO ROBERT "CINCINNATUS" CAMPBELL, MACK ELLIS, AND TO ALL GRAND JURORS ACROSS THE COUNTRY!
JUDGE LAMBERTH'S RULING ON THE 30 JUNE 2009 SUPER GRAND JURY PRESENTMENT: Misc. No. 2009-0346
In Re SUPER AMERICAN GRAND JURY
AMERICAN GRAND JURY'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER
(CLICK ON JUDGE LAMBERTH'S ANSWER BELOW TO ENLARGE)
Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973)
In re Persico. 522 F.2d 52, 54 (2d Cir. [1975])
Powell v. Katzenbach, 359 F.2d 234, 234-35 (D.C. Cir 1965)(per curiam)
JAG HUNTER HERE:
Judge Royce C. Lamberth grants permission for any recognized Grand Jury holding standing before any judge to formally accuse (present) SOETORO-OBAMA on criminal charges of TREASON and FRAUD!
Judge Lamberth has also vetted the Super Grand Jury presentment for TREASON and FRAUD, found the formal accusations meritorious, and will allow them filed formally in his criminal court.
Lamberth independently verifies a credible criminal case can be advanced against SOEHO for FRAUD and TREASON. Credible proofs and evidences filed in Lamberth's court are made available to anyone who wishes to proceed in any other criminal court, any where else in the United States.
Judge Lamberth's singular objection is that the Super Grand Jury approached the federal criminal court in the District of Columbia. Not recognized in Judge Lamberth's District Court, the Judge stated the Super Grand Jury lacked standing in the District of Columbia.
Judge Lamberth is correct that government prosecutors do enjoy discretion in the prosecution of many criminal cases.
However, the command of a Grand Jury to a prosecutor by way of presentment strips that prosecutor of the authority to refuse to bring the Grand Jury's decided, formal criminal accusation before the Petite Jury in a criminal court.
James Russell Dedrick, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District in Tennessee is on the record stating that Dedrick would not act upon the federal criminal complaint naming SOETORO-OBAMA in commission of TREASON until the criminal complaint was received from a federal judge. Judge Lamberth, in his 10 September 2009 ruling, granted U.S. Attorney Dedrick the permission Dedrick required to proceed.
Judge Lamberth issued his ruling on Thursday, 10 September 2009, just two days before the 2.5+ million people protest in Lamberth's front yard. Mack Ellis was in D.C. on 10 September and was told the Judge was still working on his response. It's not elsewhere publicly posted. Lamberth's decision is not posted on the D.C. Circuit Court publicly accessible website as-for example- Lamberth's 2 July ruling (click here scroll down: Misc. No. 2009-0346
In Re SUPER AMERICAN GRAND JURY).
HERE ENDTH THE LESSON!
WHAT ARE YOU PREPARED TO DO?
WHAT ARE YOU PREPARED TO DO?
Labels: America's Grand Jury, Judge Royce Lamberth, Mack Ellis, Robert (Bob) "Cincinnatus" Campbell, U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Copyright © 2009 The JAG HUNTER
6 Comments:
Could you, or your resident Legal Beagle, please decipher this for us? I can't tell if it's a good thing for we Grand Jury supporters.....
Please.... just simple english will work wonders... One thing I do know, this Judge Lamberth is the same Judge who gave Berg his first "No Standing" dismissal....Thanks for your help.. there are more than a few of us who are confused to say the least..
Richard
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Carter may be the Judge for a criminal case.
FOUND AT CITIZEN WELLS (http://citizenwells.wordpress.com)
"Walt seems to have a different view of it. His analysis states that the judge is saying that the presentments are valid but we have to file them in another court. Is there a hint as to which court? Would we have to have citizens’ grand juries state by state, as some already have done? Would we go to the Superior Court instead of the DC District Court?
If Walt is correct, it looks as if Judge Lamberth gave us legitimacy. But what if we file the presentments in other courts and they say they can’t accept them? Is it just a way for the courts to escape the issue, as they have for the past year?"
Robert "Cincinnatus" Campbell writes at AMERICAN GRAND JURY (http://americangrandjury.org):
"Re: Lamberth decision
The main obstacle for us to overcome is finding a judge who will see us as Constitutionally legitimate. We have already overcome the Attorney General/Eric Holder aspect..."
His long time nickname is
Robert "Topsax" Campbell
Sax as in Saxophone.
Bob is very well known among the Saxophone people.
http://forum.saxontheweb.net/showthread.php?t=66661
Read carefully and you will see it here. or try simply.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=bob+campbell+saxophone&aq=0&oq=bob+campbell+sax&aqi=g1
Post a Comment
<< Home